[1]管志杰,郭智远.中美林产品贸易碳流动的测算及影响因素研究[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2019,20(06):53-61.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2019.06.006]
　Guan Zhijie,Guo Zhiyuan.On the Measurement and Influencing Factors of Carbon Flow in Sino-US Forest Products Trade[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2019,20(06):53-61.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2019.06.006]
点击复制

中美林产品贸易碳流动的测算及影响因素研究()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第20卷
期数:
2019年06期
页码:
53-61
栏目:
经济·管理学研究
出版日期:
2019-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Measurement and Influencing Factors of Carbon Flow in Sino-US Forest Products Trade
作者:
管志杰; 郭智远
Author(s):
Guan Zhijie; Guo Zhiyuan
关键词:
林产品贸易;  引力模型;  碳流动;  储量变化法;  大气流动法;  生产法
Keywords:
forest products trade;  the gravitational model;  carbon flow;  the stock-change approach;  the atmospheric-flow approach;  the production approach
分类号:
F307.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2019.06.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
林产品贸易碳流动会影响一国碳库储碳量核算报告,对一国提交减排清单、履行减排责任具有重要的影响。首先,利用储量变化法、大气流动法、生产法分别对中美林产品贸易碳流动进行测算,结果显示储量变化法对核算我国储碳量最为有利,生产法次之,而大气流动法下中美林产品贸易则增加了碳排放源; 其次,运用引力模型,对环境治理费用占比之差、林产品进出口贸易量之差、人均GDP之差、贸易开放度之差等影响中美林产品贸易碳流动的因素进行实证分析,得出不同计量方法下,各因素产生的影响存在差别的结论。最后,从提高我国碳储角度出发,结合影响因素分析的相关结论,提出了提高我国对外开放度、扩展多元化出口市场、改善林产品出口结构、引领全球环境治理等政策建议。
Abstract:
The carbon flow of forest products trade affects a country's carbon inventory accounting report, and exerts important impacts on a country's submission of emission reduction list and performance of emission reduction responsibility. By using the stock-change approach, the atmospheric-flow approach and the production approach respectively to calculate the changes of the carbon flow of Sino-US forest products trade, it demonstrates that the stock-change approach is the most conducive to China's carbon stock accounting, followed by the production approach, while the Sino-US forest products trade has become a carbon source by the atmospheric-flow approach. Secondly, based on the gravitational model, an empirical analysis is carried out of the factors affecting the carbon flow of Sino-US forest products trade which include the difference between the proportions of environmental management costs; the difference between the import and export trade volumes of forest products; the difference between GDP per capita and the difference in trade openness, and the conclusion is reached that by different measurements, influences produced by different factors are different. Finally, from the perspective of improving China's carbon stock, combined with the conclusion through the analysis of the influencing factors, suggestions are put forward such as further opening to the outside world, expanding diversified export markets, improving the export structure of forest products and leading the global environmental governance.

参考文献/References:

[1] FISCHER P W, CULLEN A C, ETTL G J. The effect of forest management strategy on carbon storage and revenue in western washington: a probabilistic simulation of tradeoffs[J]. Risk analysis, 2017, 37(1): 173-192.
[2] 杨红强,王珊珊. IPCC框架下木质林产品碳储核算研究进展:方法选择及关联利益[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(2):44-51.
[3] 杨红强,季春艺,陈幸良,等. 中国木质林产品贸易的碳流动——基于气候谈判的视角[J].林业科学,2014,50(3):123-129.
[4] BAGDON A, HUANG C H, DEWHURST S, et al. Climate change constrains the efficiency frontier when managing forests to reduce fire severity and maximize carbon storage[J]. Ecological economics, 2017, 140(5): 201-214.
[5] ZHANG X B, YANG H Q, CHEN J X. Life-cycle carbon budget of China's harvested wood products in 1900—2015[J]. Forest policy and economics, 2018, 92(2): 181-192.
[6] GENG A X, CHEN J X,YANG H Q. Assessing the greenhouse gas mitigation potential of harvested wood products substitution in China[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2019, 53(3): 1732-1740.
[7] JASINEVI(ˇoverC)IUS G, LINDNER M, CIENCIALA E, et al. Carbon accounting in harvested wood products: assessment using material flow analysis resulting in larger pools compared to the IPCC default method[J]. Journal of industrial ecology, 2018, 22(1): 121-131.
[8] 陈家新,杨红强. 全球森林及林产品碳科学研究进展与前瞻[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,42(4):1-8.
[9] PILLI R, FIORESE G, GRASSI G. EU mitigation potential of harvested wood products[J]. Carbon balance and management, 2015, 10(1):62-68.
[10] 肖艳. 木质林产品跨境交易下碳储量核算方法比较分析[J]. 世界林业研究,2012,25(4):11-15.
[11] SKOG K E. Sequestration of carbon in harvested wood products for the United States[J]. Forest products journal,2008, 58(6): 56-72.
[12] DONLAN J, BLACK K, HENDRICK E, et al. Future change in carbon in harvested wood products from Irish forests established prior to 1990[J]. Carbon management, 2013, 4(4): 377-386.
[13] CLÁUDIA DIAS A, LOURO M, ARROJA L, et al. Comparison of methods for estimating carbon in harvested wood products[J]. Biomass and bioenergy,2009,33(2): 213-222.
[14] 白彦锋,姜春前,张守攻,等. 木质林产品碳计量方法对比分析及应用的潜在影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报,2013,30(3):423-427.
[15] 陈勇,王登举,宿海颖,等. 中美贸易战对林产品贸易的影响及其对策建议[J]. 林业经济问题,2019,39(1):1-7.
[16] 张旭芳,杨红强. 应对气候变化的中美木质林产品碳储量和碳减排比较[J]. 林业经济,2014,36(7):26-31.
[17] 伦飞,李文华,王震,等. 中国伐木制品碳储量时空差异[J].生态学报,2012,32(9):2918-2928.
[18] 周国模,姜培坤. 毛竹林的碳密度和碳贮量及其空间分布[J]. 林业科学,2004,40(6):20-24.
[19] 管志杰,徐艳. 海峡两岸贸易政策措施影响研究[J]. 常州大学学报(社会科学版),2017,18(5):69-79.
[20] 董棒棒,李莉,唐洪松,等. 环境规制、FDI与能源消费碳排放峰值预测——以西北五省为例[J].干旱区地理,2019,42(3):689-697.
[21] 吉丹俊.中国省域二氧化碳边际减排成本估计:基于参数的方法[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2017,15(1):52-62.
[22] 田刚,吴天博,张滨. 中国与“丝绸之路经济带”沿线国家木质林产品贸易的潜力分析——基于引力模型的实证研究[J].林业经济,2018,40(7):49-55.
[23] 田明华,史莹赫,高薇洋,等. 基于引力模型的中国木质林产品进出口影响因素研究及贸易潜力测算[J].林业经济问题,2018,38(5):10-18.
[24] 沈自峥,吴国春,曹玉昆,等.中国与东盟木质林产品贸易影响因素与贸易潜力的分析——基于引力模型[J].林业经济问题,2017,37(6):26-31.
[25] 戴明辉,沈文星. 中国木质林产品贸易流量与潜力研究:引力模型方法[J]. 资源科学,2010,32(11):2115-2122.
[26] 康晓. 气候变化全球治理的制度竞争——基于欧盟、美国、中国的比较[J].国际展望,2018,10(2):91-111.
[27] 耿利敏,沈文星. 中美林产品贸易现状、产业对比及发展对策分析[J]. 经济研究导刊,2018(35):115-117.

相似文献/References:

[1]管志杰,徐艳.海峡两岸贸易政策措施影响研究[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2017,18(05):69.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.05.010]
　Guan Zhijie,Xu Yan.On the Impacts of Cross-strait Trade Policies and Measures[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2017,18(06):69.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.05.010]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:管志杰,常州大学商学院教授、硕士研究生导师; 郭智远,常州大学商学院硕士研究生。
基金项目:国家哲学社会科学基金一般项目“全球治理非法采伐的贸易影响及对策研究”(13BGL101); 江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划资助项目“中国木质林产品贸易碳流动测算及对策研究”(SJKY19_2133)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-12-30