[1]刘 晓.论云间、常州词派对五代、北宋词的接受异同[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2018,19(05):108-116.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.05.013]
　Liu Xiao.Yunjian and Changzhou Ci School’s Different Reception of Ci in the Five Dynasties and the Northern Song Dynasty[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2018,19(05):108-116.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.05.013]
点击复制

论云间、常州词派对五代、北宋词的接受异同()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第19卷
期数:
2018年05期
页码:
108-116
栏目:
文史哲研究#
出版日期:
2018-09-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Yunjian and Changzhou Ci School’s Different Reception of Ci in the Five Dynasties and the Northern Song Dynasty
作者:
刘 晓
Author(s):
Liu Xiao
关键词:
云间词派;  常州词派;  五代、北宋词;  接受;  明清词坛
Keywords:
Yunjian Ci school;  Changzhou Ci school;  Ci in the Five Dynasties and the Northern Song Dynasty;  reception;  the circle of Ci in the Ming and Qing Dynasties
分类号:
I207.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.05.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
明末清初的云间词派与清代嘉庆年间兴起的常州词派,都推尊五代、北宋词。理论大旗的一致,使两派具有相通的词学主张:皆倡词有寄托,以达“风骚”之旨; 有相似的师法对象,重视“花间”温、韦词。然而,两派差异亦非常明显:在取法风格上,云间词派主宗“婉约”词风,常州词派则推重以周邦彦为代表的“浑成”一路; 在词论视野上,云间词派不免偏颇狭隘,常州词派则注意兼采众长。两派对五代、北宋词的接受差异,根本上缘于不同的历史背景、立论情境,以及因处在词学发展的不同阶段,从而导致的不同的认知视野。但它们亦前后相承,端绪相接,共同推助词坛风气向“推尊词体”一路发展,隐约勾勒出明清词坛的嬗变轨迹。
Abstract:
Yunjian and Changzhou Ci School, active respectively in the late Ming Dynasty and the early Qing Dynasty, and Jiaqing Empire of the Qing Dynasty, both think highly of the Ci in the Five Dynasties and the Northern Song Dynasty. Similar theoretical foundation means similar propositions. They both advocate “coquettish” works, worship similar models, and value Huajian authors such as Wen Tingyun and Wei Zhuang. However, differences also exist between these two schools. Yunjian Ci School prefers the genre of “delicate restraint” while Changzhou Ci School pays more attention to the genre of “refined integration”. In the perspective of Ci critism, Yunjian Ci School has narrower critical views than that of Changzhou Ci School with the latter tending to gather various good qualities. These reception discrepancies are due to their different historical backgrounds, arising contexts and developing phases of Ci-ology which bring about different cognitive perspectives. They are in succession. They both promote Ci to a “respectable” style and, to some degree, reveal the evolution route of the circle of Ci in the Ming and Qing Dynasties.

参考文献/References:


[1]龙榆生.近三百年名家词选[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2012:4.
[2]陈子龙.安雅堂稿[M].孙启治,校点.沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,2003.
[3]蒋平阶.支机集[M]//《词学》编辑委员会.词学:第2辑.上海:华东师范大学出版社,1983.
[4]周济.存审轩词·自序[M]//《清代诗文集汇编》编纂委员会.清代诗文集汇编:第535册.上海:上海古籍出版社,2010:386.
[5]张惠言.词选[M].北京:中华书局,1957.
[6]李之仪.姑溪居士全集:40[M]//王云五.丛书集成初编.上海:商务印书馆,1935:310.
[7]陈水云.唐宋词在明末清初的传播与接受[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2010:271.
[8]唐圭璋.词话丛编[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
[9]沈雄.古今词话[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2009:355.
[10]严迪昌.清词史 [M].南京:江苏古籍出版社,1999.
[11]周济.介存斋论词杂著[M].顾学颉,校点.北京:人民文学出版社,1998.
[12]张宏生.清词探微[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2008:151.
[13]徐釚.词苑丛谈[M].唐圭璋,校注.北京:中华书局,2008.
[14]周济.止庵遗集[M]//《常州先哲遗书》整理编纂委员会.常州先哲遗书后编.南京:南京大学出版社,2010:11.
[15]孙克强.周济词学思想的变化与常州词派理论的完善[J].中国文学研究,2007(2):246-263.
[16]孙克强.试论云间派的词论及其在词论史上的地位[J].中州学刊,1998(4):91-96.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:刘晓,武汉大学文学院博士研究生。
基金项目:国家哲学社会科学基金青年项目“明清之际‘经世’视域中的文学思想演进研究”(12CZW012)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-28