[1]王文华,张卓,蔡瑞林.基于灰色关联综合分析的开放式创新组织间知识协同评价研究[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2018,19(02):64-74.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.02.008]
 Wang Wenhua,Zhang Zhuo,Cai Ruilin.On Knowledge Synergy Evaluation of Open Innovation Organizations Based on Grey Relational Comprehensive Analysis[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2018,19(02):64-74.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.02.008]
点击复制

基于灰色关联综合分析的开放式创新组织间知识协同评价研究()
分享到:

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第19卷
期数:
2018年02期
页码:
64-74
栏目:
经济·管理学研究:创新管理专题研究
出版日期:
2018-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
On Knowledge Synergy Evaluation of Open Innovation Organizations Based on Grey Relational Comprehensive Analysis
作者:
王文华张卓蔡瑞林
Author(s):
Wang Wenhua Zhang Zhuo Cai Ruilin
关键词:
灰色关联 开放式创新 组织间知识协同 评价
Keywords:
grey relational open innovation inter-organizational knowledge synergy evaluation
分类号:
F270.7
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.02.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
开放式创新根本动力在于获取组织间知识协同,科学合理评价组织间知识协同是判断企业是否成功实施开放式创新的标准。论文基于组织间知识协同管理特征、组织间知识协同过程和组织间知识协同结果,构建开放式创新模式下组织间知识协同评价指标体系。运用灰色关联综合分析方法对苏南地区30家生物制药企业组织间知识协同进行评价。论文理论上完善了组织间知识协同评价指标体系,深化了组织间知识协同评价研究,实践上为企业成功实施开放式创新,提高组织间知识协同水平提供了参考依据。
Abstract:
The fundamental motive of open innovation lies in acquiring knowledge synergy among organizations. The scientific and rational evaluation of the inter-organizational knowledge synergy is the criterion to determine whether an enterprise succeeds in implementing open innovation. Based on the characteristics of the management, process and results of the inter-organizational knowledge synergy, an evaluation index system of the inter-organizational knowledge synergy under the open innovation model is constructed and the inter-organizational knowledge synergy among 30 biopharmaceutical enterprises in southern Jiangsu is evaluated by use of grey relational comprehensive analysis method. In theory, the inter-organizational knowledge synergy evaluation index system is systematically improved and the research of inter-organizational knowledge synergy evaluation is deepened. In practice, references are provided for enterprises to successfully implement open innovation and improve the level of inter-organizational knowledge synergy.

参考文献/References:

[1]陈建斌,郭彦丽,徐凯波.基于资本增值的知识协同效益评价研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2014, 35(5): 35-43.
[2]陆杉,黄福华,赵中平.供应链知识协同管理绩效评价研究[J].科技管理研究,2010(1):193-195.
[3]王婉娟,危怀安.协同创新能力评价指标体系构建——基于国家重点实验室的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2016,34(3):471-480.
[4]高航.工业技术研究院协同创新平台评价体系研究[J].科学学研究,2015,33(2):311-320.
[5]PHILBIN S.Measuring the performance of research collaborations[J].Measuring business excellence, 2008,12(3): 16-23.
[6]PLEWA C,QUESTER P.Key driver of university-industry relationships:the role of organizational compatibility and personal experience[J].Journals of service marketing, 2007,21(5): 370-382.
[7]AMIT A,ZOTT Z.Value creation by knowledge-based ecosystems:evidence from a field study[J]R&D Management,2012,42(2):123-147.
[8]HANSENM T, NOHRIA N,TIEMEY T.What’s your strategy for managing knowledge [J].Harvard business review,1999,77(2):106-116.
[9]SCHEEPERS R, VENKITACHALAM K,GIBBS M R.Knowledge strategy in organizations refining the model of Hansenm,Nohria and Tiemey[J].Journal of strategic information systems,2004,(13):201-222.
[10]彭正龙,蒋旭灿,王海花.开放式创新模式下组织间知识共享动力因素建模[J].情报杂志,2011,30(8):163-168.
[11]胡园园,顾新,程强.知识链协同效应作用机理研究[J].科学学研究, 2015, 33(4): 485-594.
[12]BRESCHI S, LISSONI F, MALERBA M.Knowledge relatedness in firm technological diversification[J].Research policy,2003,23(2):69-87.
[13]解学梅,李成.社会关系网络与新产品创新绩效——基于知识技术协同的调节效应模型[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(6):58-66.
[14]JAMES H, POPER S, VATHER P.Dynamic complementarities in innovation strategies[J].Research policy,2014, 43(10):1774-1784.
[15]LIN Z, YANG H, ARYA B.Alliance partners and firm performance: Resource complementarity and status association[J]. Strategic management journal,2009,30(9):921-940.
[16]PAULRAJ A, LADO A A, CHEN I J.Inter-organizational communication as a relational competency:antecedents and performance outcomes in collaborative buyer-supplier relationships[J].Journal of operations management,2008,26(1):45-64.
[17]LAVIE D.The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: an extension of the resource-based view[J].Academy of management review,2006,31(3):638-658.
[18]MCFADYEN M A, SEMAPENI M, CANELLA A A.Value of strong ties to dis-connected others: examining knowledge creation in biomedicine[J]. Organization science,2009,20:552-564.
[19]曾萍,邓腾智,曾雄波.IT基础、知识共享与组织创新——来自珠三角企业的经验证据[J].科学学研究,2011,29(11):1696-1707.
[20]王海花,蒋旭灿,谢富纪.开放式创新模式下组织间知识共享影响因素的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2013, 34(6): 83-90.
[21]IM G,RAI A.Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorgani-zational relationships[J].Management science,2008,54(7):1281-1296.
[22]HOWELL K E,ANNANSINGH F.Knowledge generation and sharing in UK universities: a tale of two cultures[J]. International journal of information management,2013,33(1):32-39.
[23]陈伟,杨早立,张永超.网络结构与企业核心能力关系实证研究——基于知识共享与知识整合中介效应视角[J].管理评论,2014,26(6):74-82.
[24]魏江,徐蕾.知识网络双重嵌入、知识整合与集群企业创新能力[J].管理科学学报,2014,17(2):34-46.
[25]NONAKA I, TAKEUCHI H. The knowledge creating company: how japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation[M]. Oxrord:Oxford University,1995.
[26]GRANT R M.Towards a knowledge-based theory of the firm[J].Strategic management journal,1996(17):109-122.
[27]KOCH A.Firm-internal knowledge integration and the effects on innovation[J].Journal of knowledge management,2011,15(6):984-996.
[28]邱国栋,白景坤.价值生成分析:一个协同效应的理论框架[J].中国工业经济,2007,(6):88-95.
[29]吴绍波,顾新.知识链组织之间合作的知识协同研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,29(8):83-87.
[30]徐少同,孟玺.知识协同的内涵、要素与机制研究[J].科学学研究,2013,31(7):976-982.
[31]陈建斌,郭彦丽,徐凯波.基于资本增值的知识协同效益评价研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(5):35-43.
[32]陈劲,阳银娟.企业知识伙伴的理论基础及内涵[J].技术经济,2013,32(7):1-3.
[33]MARTIN J A, Eisenhardt K M. Cross-business synergy: sources, processes and the capture of corporate value[D]. Austin: The University of Texas, McCombs School of Business,2002.
[34]郭亚军.综合评价理论、方法与应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2007.
[35]李自琼,李向东,陈晓雪.基于灰色关联度的开发区创新转型能力综合评价研究[J].宏观经济研究,2015(12):115-120.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:王文华,管理学博士,常州大学商学院副教授、硕士生导师; 张卓,管理学博士,南京航空航天大学经济与管理学院教授、博士生导师; 蔡瑞林,管理学博士,常州轻工职业技术学院教授。
基金项目:国家哲学社会科学基金一般项目“开放式创新环境下组织间知识协同效应测度及作用机制研究”(16BTQ080)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-04-20