[1]徐骏,苗运卫.智能辅助:破解环境刑事司法证据困局之匙[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2018,19(02):17-25.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.02.003]
　Xu Jun,Miao Yunwei.Intelligent Assistance: The Key to Solving the Evidence Predicament in Environmental Criminal Justice[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2018,19(02):17-25.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.02.003]
点击复制

智能辅助:破解环境刑事司法证据困局之匙()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第19卷
期数:
2018年02期
页码:
17-25
栏目:
政治·法学研究
出版日期:
2018-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Intelligent Assistance: The Key to Solving the Evidence Predicament in Environmental Criminal Justice
作者:
徐骏; 苗运卫
Author(s):
Xu Jun;  Miao Yunwei
关键词:
智能辅助;  环境刑事司法;  证据;  行刑衔接
Keywords:
intelligent assistance;  environmental criminal justice;  evidence;  administrative and judicial linkage
分类号:
DF713; TP18
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.02.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
证据取得、固定与认定是环境刑事司法的关键所在。因为环境案件的复杂性与专业性,取证主体的法定职责与技术能力难以统一、环境证据的科学认知与法律判断难以连接、举证责任的接近原则与无罪推定难以平衡已经成为困扰环境刑事司法的难题。在智能时代,依托人工智能、大数据、机器学习等技术,推动环境行刑衔接机制的有效运转、构建环境证据的认知转译平台、建立环境行为主体的数字档案,应是破局的有益思路。智能辅助将成为破解环境刑事司法证据困局的良钥:智能基准构建助力行刑协调、环境数据共享降低取证难度、呈现方式优化保障证据固定、同类数据推送辅助事实认定、智能管理监督规范鉴定标准,都将有效提升环境刑事司法的质效。
Abstract:
The key to environmental criminal justice is the acquisition, fixation and identification of evidence. Due to the complexity and professionalism of environmental cases, the statutory duty and technical ability of the subject of obtaining evidence are difficult to be unified, the scientific cognition and legal judgment of environmental evidence are difficult to be connected, and the close principle of the burden of proof and the innocence presumption are difficult to be balanced, which have become the difficult issues in environmental criminal justice. In the age of intelligence, relying on artificial intelligence, big data, machine learning, etc. to promote the effective operation of the environmental administrative and judicial linkage mechanism, build up a cognitive translation platform of environmental evidence and establish digital archives of environmental actors, is a useful way to change the situation. Intelligence assistance shall become the key to solving the evidence predicament in environmental criminal justice: intelligent benchmark makes the administration and the judiciary more coordinated, environmental data sharing reduces the difficulty of obtaining evidence, the method of presentation optimization ensures the fixation of evidence, similar data push assists the fact finding, and intelligent management and supervision standardizes the identification, which will greatly enhance the quality and efficiency of the environmental criminal justice.

参考文献/References:

[1]罗书臻.最高法发布环资审判白皮书和环境司法发展报告[N].人民法院报,2017-07-14(1).
[2]李楯.环境公益诉讼观察报告:2015卷[M].北京:法律出版社,2016: 1.
[3]吕忠梅,焦艳鹏.中国环境司法的基本形态、当前样态与未来发展——对《中国环境司法发展报告(2015—2017)的解读》[J].环境保护,2017(18): 7-12.
[4]赵旭光.生态环境执法与刑事司法衔接中的证据问题及解决[J].证据科学,2017,25(5): 547-557.
[5]杨继文.污染环境犯罪因果关系的证明[J].政治与法律,2017(12):77-88.
[6]王灿发,冯嘉.我国环境诉讼的困境与出路[J].环境保护,2016(15):11-14.
[7]张自力,王峻,高超,等.人工智能新视野[M].北京:科学出版社,2016: 22.
[8]顾向一,曹婷.“两法衔接”:从刑事优先原则到同步协调原则[C]//河海大学法学院,江苏省环境资源法学研究会.华东地区环境法理论与实践研讨会暨江苏省法学会环境资源法学研究会2017年年会论文选集.南京:河海大学出版社,2017: 43-52.
[9]刘锐,刘俊,谢涛,等.互联网时代的环境大数据[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2016:51.
[10]朱福喜.人工智能[M].3版.北京:清华大学出版社,2017:187.
[11]徐骏.智慧法院的法理审思[J].法学,2017(3):55-64.
[12]杨小军.法治中国视域下的司法体制改革研究[J].法学杂志,2014(3): 25-33.
[13]黄卫.环境司法鉴定机构建设初探[J].环境监测管理与技术,2012(2):1-4.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:徐骏,法学博士,南京信息工程大学法政学院副教授、硕士生导师; 苗运卫,南京信息工程大学法政学院硕士研究生。
基金项目:江苏省社会科学基金一般项目“新媒体环境下刑事司法的舆论应对机制研究”(14FXC004); 江苏省大学生实践创新训练计划项目“环境司法的公众认知调查及动员方案设计”(201710300064Y)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-04-20