[1]杨 霞.地域文化视野中汉魏之际士人的身份裂变——以王粲、仲长统的地域流动为例[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2018,19(01):96-108.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.01.011]
　Yang Xia.Identity Fission of Scholars in the Period of the Late Han Dynasty and the Early Wei Dynasty from the Perspective of Regional Culture—A Case Study of Wang Can and Zhongchang Tong’s Regional Migration[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2018,19(01):96-108.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.01.011]
点击复制

地域文化视野中汉魏之际士人的身份裂变——以王粲、仲长统的地域流动为例()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第19卷
期数:
2018年01期
页码:
96-108
栏目:
文史哲研究
出版日期:
2018-02-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Identity Fission of Scholars in the Period of the Late Han Dynasty and the Early Wei Dynasty from the Perspective of Regional Culture—A Case Study of Wang Can and Zhongchang Tong’s Regional Migration
作者:
杨 霞
Author(s):
Yang Xia
关键词:
汉魏之际;  地域流动;  身份裂变;  王粲;  仲长统
Keywords:
the period of the late Han Dynasty and the early Wei Dynasty;  regional migration;  identity fission;  Wang Can;  Zhongchang Tong
分类号:
I206.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2018.01.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
士人的地域流动及流动区域的地域文化对士人的性格塑造、思想变迁与文章写作有着重要的推动作用,并时常引发其身份的变化。这种连动在乱世中表现尤为明显。以汉魏之际士人王粲、仲长统为例:两者皆起自山阳高平; 其后南北殊途,王粲由洛阳至长安、再至荆州,仲长统游历青、徐、并、冀四州之间; 最终二人分别归于邺城曹氏与许都汉室。两者身份也随各自流动而发生裂变:由最初的鲁文化中的少年儒生,分别经过荆楚、幽并文化的熏染而呈现出鲜明的“流寓客”与“狂异生”形象,最后通过与邺下文人、许都诸儒的交流,王粲文学家、仲长统思想家的新身份得以形成。扩大而言之,以王粲、仲长统为代表的汉魏之际士人群体的地域流动与流动所带来的身份变化也是加速此期士人独立与文学自觉的历史进程的重要动因。
Abstract:
The regional migration and culture have significant impacts on scholars’ characters, ideas and works and often cause their identity change. This linkage is especially obvious in troublesome times. Taking Wang Can and Zhongchang Tong in the late Han Dynasty and the early Wei Dynasty as examples, they both came from Gaoping, a county of Shanyang, then went toward different districts in which Wang Can experienced Luoyang, Chang’an and Jingzhou, and Zhongchang Tong experienced four states of Qing, Xu, Bing and Ji. And at last, they entered Yecheng under Cao ruling and Xudu under Han ruling separately. Their identities changed accordingly: at first, they were both young Confucian scholars in the Lu culture circle. Then they showed distinct images as a lonely stranger and an unconventional scholar after being affected deeply by different regional cultures of Jingchu circle and Youbing circle. Finally, Wang Can became a litterateur and Zhongchang Tong became an ideologist. What’s more, the regional migration and identity fission of the scholar groups represented by Wang Can and Zhongchang Tong is an important motivation for accelerating the historical process of the scholars’ independence and literary consciousness in the transition between Han and Wei Dynasties.

参考文献/References:

[1]范晔.后汉书[M].李贤,注.北京:中华书局,1965.
[2]陈寿.三国志[M].北京:中华书局,1959.
[3]先秦汉魏晋南北朝诗[M].逯钦立,辑校.北京:中华书局,1983.
[4]缪钺.读史存稿[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1963:118.
[5]王晓毅.儒释道与魏晋玄学形成[M].北京:中华书局,2003:83-84.
[6]景蜀慧.王粲典定朝仪与其家世学术背景考述[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003(4):92-101.
[7]严可均.全后汉文[M].许振生,审订.北京:商务印书馆,1999.
[8]沈玉成.王粲评传[M].济南:山东教育出版社,1983:228.
[9]严可均.全三国文[M].马志伟,审订.北京:商务印书馆,1999.
[10]钟嵘.诗品集注[M].曹旭,集注.上海:上海古籍出版社,1994:117.
[11]班固.汉书[M].颜师古,注.北京:中华书局,1962:2353.
[12]田余庆.汉魏之际的青徐豪霸研究[J].历史研究,1983(3):33-49.
[13]司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,1963:3263.
[14]钱锺书.管锥编[M].北京:中华书局,1979:1031.
[15]沈约.宋书[M].北京:中华书局,1974:329.
[16]杜佑.通典[M].北京:中华书局,1988:3756.
[17]刘勰.文心雕龙注释[M].周振甫,注.北京:人民文学出版社,1981:504.
[18]杨霞.论仲长统儒、道、玄思想的交杂与转化[J].南京工业职业技术学院学报,2008,8(1):18-20.
[19]周明,胡旭.关于“文学自觉时代”的再认识[J].江苏教育学院学报(社会科学版),2003,19(5):77-82.
[20]詹福瑞.文士、经生的文士化与文学的自觉[J].河北学刊,1998(4):84-89.
[21]李春青.在“文人”与“士大夫”之间——略论中国古代知识阶层的身份冲突[J].船山学刊,2013(3):74-82.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:杨霞,文学博士,安徽广播电视大学文法学院副教授。
基金项目:安徽省高等学校人文社会科学研究重点项目“士人流动与东汉文本书写”(SK2017A1020)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-02-20