[1]李勇,陈艳艳.论分析马克思主义的兴起与未来[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2017,18(06):9-15.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.06.002]
 Li Yong,Chen Yanyan.On the Early Development and Future of Analytical Marxism[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2017,18(06):9-15.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.06.002]
点击复制

论分析马克思主义的兴起与未来()
分享到:

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第18卷
期数:
2017年06期
页码:
9-15
栏目:
哲学研究
出版日期:
2017-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Early Development and Future of Analytical Marxism
作者:
李勇陈艳艳
Author(s):
Li Yong Chen Yanyan
关键词:
分析马克思主义历史唯物主义正义平等
Keywords:
Analytical Marxism Historical Materialism justice equality
分类号:
B17
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.06.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
分析马克思主义诞生于20世纪下半叶。它既是对分析哲学与西方马克思主义内部争论的超越,也是对20世纪下半叶学生工人运动的一种回应。分析马克思主义在追求马克思理论的确定性和科学性表述的同时,所展开的关于正义问题的探讨使其成功立足于英语世界的主流学术圈。时至今日,尽管作为学术流派的分析马克思主义沉寂了,但分析马克思主义的分析方式与精神已经渗透到了相关学科领域,并将持续影响这些学科的未来发展。
Abstract:
In the second half of the 20th century, Analytical Marxism emerged. It is the transcendence of the argument between the analytical philosophy and the western Marxism. It is also a response to the movement of students and workers in the second half of the 20th century. During the pursuit of certainty and the scientific interpretation of Marxist theory, Analytical Marxism established its name in the English mainstream academic circle through the discussion on the issue of justice. At present, although Analytical Marxism is no longer popular as an academic genre, the analytical method and spirit of Analytical Marxism has penetrated into relevant disciplines, and will continue influencing the future development of these disciplines.

参考文献/References:

[1]李勇.英国马克思主义的宗教研究视阈[J].马克思主义与现实,2015(2):155-160.
[2]LEVINE A.A future for Marxism?[M].London:Pluto Press,2003.
[3]ROEMER E J.Analytical foundations of Marxian economic theory[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1982:73.
[4]KUHN S T.The structure of scientific revolutions[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1962:15.
[5]李勇,张懿.柯亨论公正社会的可致性[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2016,35(2):18-22.
[6]李瑞艳,乔瑞金.安德森“类型学”唯物史观思维范式探析[J].山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,36(3):34-38.
[7]POPPER K.The poverty of historicism[M].London:Routledge & Kegan Paul,1958:19.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:李勇,哲学博士,山西大学马克思主义哲学研究所副教授,硕士生导师;陈艳艳,哲学博士,山西大学哲学社会学学院讲师。基金项目:国家社会科学基金一般项目“英国马克思主义的宗教观研究”(16BZJ007)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-12-20