[1]孙全胜.罗尔斯对正义稳定性的论证[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2017,18(02):9-18.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.02.002]
　Sun Quansheng.Rawls’s Demonstration of Justice Stability[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2017,18(02):9-18.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.02.002]
点击复制

罗尔斯对正义稳定性的论证()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第18卷
期数:
2017年02期
页码:
9-18
栏目:
哲学研究
出版日期:
2017-03-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Rawls’s Demonstration of Justice Stability
作者:
孙全胜
Author(s):
Sun Quansheng
关键词:
罗尔斯;  公平正义;  一致性;  稳定性
Keywords:
Rawls;  equity and justice;  consistency;  stability
分类号:
B829
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2017.02.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
罗尔斯正义理论主要是基于资本主义社会制度建构的,这正彰显了特定社会制度下生产方式的缺陷。很多正义问题是无法解决的,只能随着外在环境和生产方式的改变而消亡。罗尔斯正义理论对自由、平等、权利的追求,是基于人的自由意志和个人选择。他认为,正义和善达成一致性才能保持正义的稳定性; 同时,正义的稳定性也来源于共识与规范性,通过理性能够建立规范,并达成共识。正义不是至善,也许只是中善,但它仍能够充当其他价值的规范性要求。考察罗尔斯对正义稳定性的论证,可以为社会主义公平正义的实现提供有益借鉴。
Abstract:
Rawls’s justice theory is mainly based on the capitalist social system, which demonstrates defects of the production mode under a particular social system. A lot of justice problems cannot be solved, but they will die out with changes of the external environment and the production mode. Rawls’s justice theory with the pursuit of freedom, equality and rights is based on human beings’ free will and personal choices. In his opinion, the consistency between justice and goodness can ensure justice stability. Meanwhile, justice stability comes from consensus and normativeness which can be realized through rationality. Justice is not extremely good, maybe it’s just good, but it is still able to act as a regulatory requirement for other values. Rawls’s demonstration of justice stability can provide beneficial references for the realization of socialist equity and justice.

参考文献/References:

[1]约翰·罗尔斯.正义论[M].何怀宏,译. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社,1988.
[2]约瑟夫·熊彼特.资本主义、社会主义与民主[M].吴良健,译.北京:商务印书馆, 1999:370.
[3]德拉·沃尔佩.卢梭与马克思[M].赵培杰,译.重庆:重庆出版社,1993:35.
[4] RAWLS J.Justice as fairness: a restatement[M].Harvard:The Belknap Press,2001: 63.
[5] NOZICK R.Anarchy, state and utopia[M]. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell Press, 1974:9.
[6] RAWLS J.A theory of justice[M]. Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971:58.
[7] RAWLS J.Political liberalism: reply to Habermas[J]. The Journal of Philosophy,1995,92(3):132-180.
[8]约翰·斯图亚特·穆勒.功利主义[M].刘福胜,译.北京:光明日报出版社,2007:1.
[9] DWORKIN R.Sovereign virtue: the theory and practice of equality[M].Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000:118.
[10]约翰·罗尔斯.政治自由主义[M].万俊人,译.南京: 译林出版社,2000:42.
[11]姚大志.公共理性与合法性:评罗尔斯的《政治自由主义》[J].江苏行政学院学报,2010(2):25-30.
[12] RAWLS J.The idea of public reason revisited,in The Law of Peoples[M].Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1999:132.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:孙全胜,哲学博士,山东师范大学政治与国际关系学院讲师。
基金项目:国家社科基金项目“现代科技伦理的应然逻辑研究”(12BZX078); 教育部人文社会科学基金项目“马克思科技伦理思想及其当代发展研究”(08JA720004)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-03-28