[1]孙尚诚,杨洁高.儒商的顺式生态思维及其现代发展理路[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2016,17(06):1-5.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2016.06.001]
 Sun Shangcheng,Yang Jiegao.Confucian Businessmen’s Ecological Thought of Obedience and Its Modern Development[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2016,17(06):1-5.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2016.06.001]
点击复制

儒商的顺式生态思维及其现代发展理路()
分享到:

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第17卷
期数:
2016年06期
页码:
1-5
栏目:
哲学研究
出版日期:
2016-12-13

文章信息/Info

Title:
Confucian Businessmen’s Ecological Thought of Obedience and Its Modern Development
作者:
孙尚诚杨洁高
Author(s):
Sun ShangchengYang Jiegao
关键词:
儒商 生态思维 消极义务 积极义务
Keywords:
Confucian businessmen ecology thought obedience negative obligation positive obligation
分类号:
B824
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2016.06.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
探讨儒家的生态思维一般来说主要依据于两点:一是“天人合一”的道德本体论; 二是由孟子开启的将“仁爱”及于万物的道德情感论。儒家这种思想对现代人思考社会责任存在着四处裨益性启示。儒家的“天人合一”论也看到了宇宙自然规律超越于人力的重要一面,这使得儒商的商业经营活动表现为“顺”:顺应天时,顺应地利。这种“顺”式思维理路在遭遇现代生态危机时,应当呈现出更丰富的向度和内涵,对现代儒商而言,就意味着应当承担消极和积极两重义务。
Abstract:
Generally, we talk about Confucian ecological thought mainly based on two points: firstly, it is the unity of nature and moral ontology; secondly, it is built by Mencius which is named moral emotion theory that advocates love all things in the world. There are four beneficial enlightenments from Confucian thought to modern social responsibility. In addition, the Confucian theory of harmony between nature and human finds one important side of the rule of universe beyond manpower. And it makes Confucian businessmen’s commercial activities show the “obedience”: obedience to the natural time, obedience to the right environment. When the thought of obedience lies in modern ecological background, it should show more rich direction and connotation. For modern Confucian businessmen, it means they should bear negative and positive obligations.

参考文献/References:

[1]程颢,程颐.二程集[M].王孝鱼,点校.北京:中华书局,2004:184.
[2]黎靖德.朱子语类[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
[3]王守仁.王阳明[M].北京:线状书局,2014:226.
[4]余正荣.中国生态伦理传统的阐释与重建[M].北京:人民出版社,2002:170.
[5]管曙光.诸子集成[M].长春:长春出版社,1999:140.
[6]何怀宏.儒家生态伦理思想述略[J].中国人民大学学报,2000(2):32.
[7]李山.管子[M].北京:中华书局,2016:106.
[8]张海鹏,王廷元.明清徽商资料选编[M].黄山:黄山书社,1985:109.
[9]薛平.现代“儒商”特征四议[J].扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版),2009(3):29.

相似文献/References:

[1]罗迪江.生态翻译学视域下绿色翻译的思维结构与问题域[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2022,23(01):89.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.01.10]
 Luo Dijiang.The Thinking Structure and Question Field of Green Translation from the Perspective of Eco-Translatology[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2022,23(06):89.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.01.10]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:孙尚诚,哲学博士,湖南大学马克思主义学院讲师; 杨洁高,哲学博士,九江学院文学与传媒学院讲师。基金项目:湖南省社科基金项目“理性宗教在乡村社会的影响研究”(15YBA095)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-11-20