[1]王伟.殊途同归的“诗意的实用主义”—再回应舒斯特曼先生[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2024,25(05):108-116.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.05.011]
　Wang Wei.“Poetic Pragmatism” with Different Ways and Same Goal:a Rebuttal to Mr.Shusterman again[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2024,25(05):108-116.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.05.011]
点击复制

殊途同归的“诗意的实用主义”—再回应舒斯特曼先生()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第25卷
期数:
2024年05期
页码:
108-116
栏目:
文史哲研究
出版日期:
2024-09-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
“Poetic Pragmatism” with Different Ways and Same Goal:a Rebuttal to Mr.Shusterman again
作者:
王伟
Author(s):
Wang Wei
关键词:
强健诗人的实用主义;  诗意的实用主义;  舒斯特曼;  罗蒂;  回应
Keywords:
pragmatism of the strong poets;  poetic pragmatism;  Shusterman;  Rorty;  response
分类号:
B834.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.05.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
实用主义既有共同的精神旨趣,又有竞争性的差异叙事。罗蒂与舒斯特曼均致力于复兴实用主义传统,均被视为新实用主义的代表人物。但舒斯特曼站在“诗意的实用主义”立场上,批评罗蒂“强健诗人的实用主义”是一种补偿性的文本式逃避,忽视了身体与非话语经验。问题在于,一方面,舒斯特曼对罗蒂实用主义的定位有些偏颇,叙述亦不准确; 另一方面,舒斯特曼张扬非话语经验,又坠入了实用主义传统批判过的“所与神话”的泥淖。其实,承认所有经验的语言性,不仅并不意味着否认舒斯特曼身体美学的有效性,而且有助于进一步拓展罗蒂与舒斯特曼都提倡的共同体的建构路径。
Abstract:
There are both common spiritual interests and competitive narrative differences in pragmatism. Both Rorty and Shusterman are committed to reviving the tradition of pragmatism, and are regarded as representatives of new pragmatism. But from the standpoint of “poetic pragmatism”, Shusterman criticizes Rorty's “pragmatism of the strong poet” as a compensatory textual escape, ignoring body and non-discursive experience. The problem is that, on the one hand, Shusterman's positioning of Rorty's pragmatism is somewhat biased and the description is not accurate; on the other hand, Shusterman publicizes the non-discourse experience, and falls into the marsh of “given myth” criticized by the traditional pragmatism. In fact, acknowledging the linguistic nature of all experiences does not necessarily mean denying the effectiveness of Shusterman's body aesthetics, but also helps to further expand the path of community construction advocated by both Rorty and Shusterman.

参考文献/References:

[1]韦斯特. 美国人对哲学的逃避:实用主义的谱系 [M].董山民, 译. 南京:南京大学出版社,2016.
[2]萨特康普. 罗蒂和实用主义:哲学家对批评家的回应[M]. 张国清, 译. 北京:商务印书馆,2003.
[3]SHUSTERMAN R. Pragmatist philosophy for our times: reviewing Rorty's legacy [J]. Society, 2022, 59(5): 583-590.
[4]SHUSTERMAN R,DREON R. Pragmatist aesthetics: histories, questions, and consequences: an interview with Richard Shusterman [J]. European journal of pragmatism and American philosophy, 2021,13(1): 1-14.
[5]罗蒂. 偶然、反讽与团结 [M]. 徐文瑞,译. 北京:商务印书馆,2003.
[6]RORTY R. Contingency, irony, and solidarity [M].Cambridge:Cambridgc University Press, 1989:43.
[7]SHUSTERMAN R.Pragmatist aesthetics: living beauty, rethinking art [M]. 2nd ed. NY: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2000:127.
[8]舒斯特曼. 实用主义美学:生活之美,艺术之思 [M].彭锋,译.北京:商务印书馆,2002: 182.
[9]舒斯特曼. 通过身体来思考:身体美学文集 [M]. 张宝贵,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2020.
[10]罗蒂. 实用主义哲学 [M].林南,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2009: 27.
[11]RORTY R. Response to Richard Shusterman [M]// FESTENSTEIN M,THOMPSON S. Richard Rorty: critical dialogues. Cambridge: Polity, 2002: 156-157.
[12]罗蒂. 真理与进步[M]. 杨玉成,译. 北京:华夏出版社,2003: 150.
[13]罗蒂. 哲学、文学和政治 [M].黄宗英,等译. 上海:上海译文出版社,2009: 76-77.
[14]舒斯特曼. 情感与行动:实用主义之道 [M]. 高砚平,译.北京:商务印书馆,2018.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:王伟,文学博士,福建社会科学院文学所研究员。
基金项目:福建社会科学院社会科学规划课题“理查德·罗蒂的马克思主义观解析与批判”(FJSKY52240305)。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01