[1]柴敏辉.“六经本史”:龚自珍的史学折变与经学路向[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2024,25(05):87-96.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.05.009]
　Chai Minhui.“The Six ConfucianClassics Originatefrom History”: Gong Zizhen's Transformation in Historiography and His Path of Study of Jing[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2024,25(05):87-96.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.05.009]
点击复制

“六经本史”:龚自珍的史学折变与经学路向()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第25卷
期数:
2024年05期
页码:
87-96
栏目:
文史哲研究
出版日期:
2024-09-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
“The Six ConfucianClassics Originatefrom History”: Gong Zizhen's Transformation in Historiography and His Path of Study of Jing
作者:
柴敏辉
Author(s):
Chai Minhui
关键词:
龚自珍;  六经本史;  六经皆史;  微言;  常州学派
Keywords:
Gong Zizhen;  the SixConfucianClassicsoriginatefrom history;  the SixConfucianClassics are allabout history;  “sublime words” doctrine;  Changzhou School
分类号:
B249
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.05.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
龚自珍以史学为突破口,承章学诚“六经皆史”之余绪,融入常州学派的“微言”之学,从而折变为“六经本史”说,打通了经史之学与“经世”的联系。龚自珍的“六经本史”一方面认为经学源于史学但高于史学,所以研析“六经”成为治学的应有之义,于是终又回到“小学训诂”上; 另一方面认为“情则生其文”,将经学还原为“情”,并高扬“儒者”之历史使命,要求“儒者”能“以己治之”。但是,时势又倒逼着龚氏埋头于学术之中,只能空悬“太史公之志”聊以自慰。
Abstract:
Gong Zizhen took historiography as a breakthrough, inherited Zhang Xuecheng's “the SixConfucianClassics are allabout history” and incorporated the “sublime words” doctrine of Changzhou School, thus transforming into “the SixConfucianClassicsoriginatefrom history”, connecting the disciplines of Jing and historiography with practical governance(“administeraffairs”). Gong Zizhen's “the SixConfucianClassicsoriginatefrom history”, on the one hand, believed that the study of Jing originated from historiography but was higher than historiography, so the study of “the SixConfucianClassics ” became the due meaning of scholarship, and finally returned to “traditionalChinesehermeneutics”. On the other hand, he viewed the “expression of emotions as central to literary creation”, redefining the study of Jing around emotional truth(“Qing”)and underscoring the historical role of the “Confucian scholars” to “self-govern”. However, the situation forced Gong to immerse himself in the academic work, and he could only hang the “ambition of the Sima Qian” to comfort the rest of his life.

参考文献/References:

[1]钱穆.中国近三百年学术史:1[M]//钱穆.钱宾四先生全集.台北:联经出版事业公司,1998.
[2]章学诚.文史通义校注:上册[M].叶瑛,校注.北京:中华书局,2014.
[3]刘巍.中国学术之近代命运[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2013.
[4]龚自珍.龚自珍全集[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1975.
[5]钱穆.两汉经学今古文平议[M]//钱穆.钱宾四先生全集.台北:联经出版事业公司,1998:269.
[6]汤志钧.近代经学与政治[M].北京:中华书局,2000:104.
[7]吴根友.中国哲学通史:清代卷[M].郭齐勇,主编.学术版.南京:江苏人民出版社,2021:528.
[8]冯友兰.三松堂全集:第3卷[M].2版.郑州:河南人民出版社,2000:6.
[9]张之洞.书目答问补正[M].范希曾,补正.徐鹏,导读.上海:上海古籍出版社,2001:258.
[10]段玉裁.经韵楼集[M].钟敬华,校点.上海:上海古籍出版社,2008:236-237.
[11]张寿安.龚自珍论“六经”与“六艺”:传统学术知识分化的第一步[J].清史研究,2009,75(3):49-61.
[12]庄存与.庄存与集(附庄绶甲集)[M]//曾学文,徐大军.清人著述丛刊:第1辑.扬州:广陵书社,2019.
[13]刘逢禄.刘礼部集[M]//北京大学《儒藏》编纂与研究中心.儒藏精华编:278.北京:北京大学出版社,2016.
[14]路新生.中国近三百年疑古思潮研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2001:401.
[15]黄开国.清代今文经学新论[M].北京:人民出版社,2017.
[16]春秋公羊传注疏[M].《十三经注疏》整理委员会,整理.北京:北京大学出版社,2000:8.
[17]陈其泰.清代公羊学[M].增订本.上海:上海人民出版社,2011:150.
[18]张寿安.龚自珍学术思想研究[M].台北:文史哲出版社,1997.
[19]夏曾佑.夏曾佑集:下册[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2011:419.
[20]庄述祖.庄述祖集[M]//曾学文,徐大军.清人著述丛刊:第1辑.扬州:广陵书社,2019:238.
[21]漆永祥.乾嘉考据学研究[M].增订本.北京:北京大学出版社,2020:9.
[22]龚郭清.“始卒”、“心情”和“出史入道”:论龚自珍的历史观和史学观[J].天津社会科学,2014(6):133-138.
[23]蒋大椿.龚自珍历史认识思想略探[J].近代史研究,1995(1):62-74.
[24]张广生,许孟洋.嘉道变局下的经学新诠:龚自珍论“一贯”“终始”与“五经大义”[J].清史研究,2021(5):12-23.
[25]张昭军.龚自珍经世思想学术渊源考论[J].齐鲁学刊,2004(4):114-119.
[26]陈国庆.晚清社会与文化[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005:282.
[27]梁启超.清代学术概论[M]. 朱维铮,导读.上海:上海古籍出版社,1998:75.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:柴敏辉,山东大学儒学高等研究院博士研究生
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01