[1]宋杰.叙事体验性——马可·卡拉乔洛基于“背景”与“影响”概念的理论重构[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2024,25(03):98-106.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.03.010]
　Song Jie.Narrative Experientiality:Marco Caracciolo's Theoretical Reconstruction Based on the Concepts of “Background” and “Impact”[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2024,25(03):98-106.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.03.010]
点击复制

叙事体验性——马可·卡拉乔洛基于“背景”与“影响”概念的理论重构()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第25卷
期数:
2024年03期
页码:
98-106
栏目:
文史哲研究
出版日期:
2024-05-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Narrative Experientiality:Marco Caracciolo's Theoretical Reconstruction Based on the Concepts of “Background” and “Impact”
作者:
宋杰
Author(s):
Song Jie
关键词:
马可·卡拉乔洛;  莫妮卡·弗卢德尼克;  叙事体验性;  背景;  影响
Keywords:
Marco Caracciolo;  Monika Fludernik;  narrative experientiality;  background;  impact
分类号:
I0-05
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2024.03.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
比利时认知叙事学研究者马可·卡拉乔洛系统地探究过叙事体验性问题。在这一问题上,莫妮克·弗卢德尼克的相关论述为卡拉乔洛提供了重要的理论基础,但卡拉乔洛认为弗卢德尼克过于简化了叙事与体验之间的关系,将体验性直接等同于叙事性,从而导致她无法从本质上真正揭示叙事体验性的内涵。在与弗卢德尼克“商榷”的过程中,卡拉乔洛进一步考察了叙事与体验之间的关系,并基于“背景”与“影响”这两个概念,对叙事体验性进行了再定义。在卡拉乔洛看来,叙事体验性可以视为故事对其参与者产生的影响,影响越大,叙事体验性就越高; 另外,叙事体验性较高的故事产生的影响能重构故事参与者的体验性背景。卡拉乔洛的叙事体验性研究是一次从全新的视角重探叙事学经典问题的成功尝试,不仅充实了叙事体验性的理论内涵,还为当今如火如荼开展着的跨学科叙事学研究提供了有益的借鉴。
Abstract:
Marco Caracciolo, a researcher engaged in studies on cognitive narratology from Belgium, systematically explores the issue of narrative experientiality. As for narrative experientiality, Monika Fludernik's research on this subject provides important theoretical foundation for Caracciolo. However, Caracciolo claims that Fludernik oversimplifies the relationship between narrative and experience and equates experientiality with narrativity directly, which prevents her from fully revealing the essence of narrative experientiality. In the process of “discussing with” Fludernik, Caracciolo further examines the relationship between narrative and experience and redefines narrative experientiality based on the concepts of “background” and “impact”. According to Caracciolo, narrative experientiality can be seen as the impact stories have on their participants; the stronger the impact, the higher the narrative experientiality. In addition, the impact of the stories with higher narrative experientiality can restructure the experiential background of those who engage with them. Caracciolo's study on narrative experientiality is a successful attempt to re-explore the classical issue in narratology from a completely new perspective. This study not only enriches the theoretical connotation of narrative experientiality, but also provides instructive reference for current interdisciplinary narrative studies that are in full swing.

参考文献/References:

[1] FLUDERNIK M. Towards a ‘natural' narratology[M]. London: Routledge, 1996.
[2] STERNBERG M. How narrativity makes a difference[J]. Narrative, 2001, 9(2): 115-122.
[3] ALBER J. The “moreness” or “lessness” of “natural” narratology: Samuel Beckett's “lessness” reconsidered[J]. Style, 2002, 36(1): 54-75.
[4] WOLF W. Narrative and narrativity: a narratological reconceptualization and its applicability to the visual arts[J]. Word & image, 2003, 19(3): 180-197.
[5] RYAN M-L. On the theoretical foundations of transmedial narratology[M]//MEISTER J C, KINDT T, SCHERNUS W. Narratology beyond literary criticism: mediality, disciplinarity. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2005: 1-23.
[6] HERMAN D. Basic elements of narrative[M]. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009: 211.
[7] DIENGOTT N. Fludernik's natural narratological model: a reconsideration and pedagogical implications[J]. Journal of literary semantics, 2010, 39(1): 93-101.
[8]LABOV W, WALETZKY J. Narrative analysis: oral versions ofpersonal experience [M]//HELM J. Essays on the verbal and visual arts: proceedings of the 1996 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1967: 12-44.
[9] CARACCIOLO M. Notes for a(nother)theory of experientiality[J]. Journal of literary theory, 2012, 6(1): 177-194.
[10]SCALISE SUGIYAMA M. Food, foragers, and folklore: the role of narrative in human subsistence[J]. Evolution and human behavior, 2001, 22(4): 221-240.
[11] OCHS E, CAPPS L. Living narrative: creating lives in everyday storytelling[M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.
[12] MENARY R. Embodied narratives[J]. Journal of consciousness studies, 2008, 15(6): 63-84.
[13] HERMAN D. Cognition, emotion, and consciousness [M]//HERMAN D. The Cambridge companion to narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007: 256.
[14] CARACCIOLO M. Fictional consciousnesses: a reader's manual[J]. Style, 2012, 46(1): 42-65.
[15] SEARLE J R. The rediscovery of the mind[M]. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1992: 195.
[16] SEARLE J R. Intentionality: an essay in the philosophy of mind[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983: 154.
[17] PRED R. Onflow: dynamics of consciousness and experience[M]. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2005.
[18] ISER W. The act of reading: a theory of aesthetic response[M]. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.
[19] PHELAN J. Experiencing fiction: judgments, progressions, and the rhetorical theory of narrative[M]. Columbus: The Ohio State University, 2007: 3.
[20] CARACCIOLO M. On the experientiality of stories: a follow-up on David Herman's “narrative theory and the intentional stance”[J]. Partial answers: journal of literature and the history of ideas, 2012, 10(2): 197-221.
[21] CARACCIOLO M. Narrative, meaning, interpretation: an enactivist approach[J]. Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences, 2012, 11(3): 367-384.
[22]CARACCIOLO M. Experientiality[M]//HÜHN P, MEISTER J C, PIER J, et al. Handbook of narratology. 2nd ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2014: 149-158.
[23] CARACCIOLO M. The experientiality of narrative: an enactivist approach[M]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2014.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:宋杰,浙江大学外国语学院博士研究生。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目“当代西方叙事学前沿理论的翻译与研究”(17ZDA281)。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01