[1]刘友金,李玮瑾,周健.“一带一路”倡议对我国OFDI企业产能利用率影响研究—基于双重变换模型的实证分析[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2022,23(01):1-13.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.01.001]
　Liu Youjin,Li Weijin,Zhou Jian.On the Impact of “the Belt and Road Initiative” on Chinese OFDI Enterprise Capacity Utilization Rate: An Empirical Analysis Based on Change-in-Change Model[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2022,23(01):1-13.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.01.001]
点击复制

“一带一路”倡议对我国OFDI企业产能利用率影响研究—基于双重变换模型的实证分析()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第23卷
期数:
2022年01期
页码:
1-13
栏目:
一带一路高质量发展专稿
出版日期:
2022-01-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Impact of “the Belt and Road Initiative” on Chinese OFDI Enterprise Capacity Utilization Rate: An Empirical Analysis Based on Change-in-Change Model
作者:
刘友金; 李玮瑾; 周健
Author(s):
Liu Youjin;  Li Weijin;  Zhou Jian
关键词:
“一带一路”;  产能利用率;  双重变换模型;  市场规模;  外源融资
Keywords:
“the Belt and Road Initiative”;  capacity utilization rate;  Change-in-Change model;  market size;  external financing
分类号:
F125; F279.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2022.01.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在有效控制其他产能利用率影响因素的条件下,采用2009—2018年制造业A股上市公司数据,基于双重变换模型研究了“一带一路”倡议的实施对中国OFDI企业产能利用率的影响及其作用机制。结果显示:“一带一路”倡议的实施显著提升了沿线国家投资企业的产能利用率,且这种提升作用主要是通过扩大企业市场规模和缓解企业融资约束等机制实现的。研究进一步拓展分析结果表明,“一带一路”倡议对中国OFDI企业产能利用率的提升作用主要集中于非新兴优势产业相关企业、国有企业、投资“一带一路”沿线非中国邻国的企业和投资中高收入东道国的企业。以上结论从微观企业视角为“一带一路”倡议下政府如何化解产能过剩这一“顽疾”提供了理论启示。
Abstract:
Under the condition of effectively controlling other influencing factors of the capacity utilization rate of enterprises, this paper uses the data of A-share listed companies in the manufacturing industry from 2009 to 2018 and studies the influence of the implementation of “the Belt and Road Initiative” on the capacity utilization rate of Chinese OFDI enterprises and its mechanism based on Change-in-Change model. The results show that the implementation of “the Belt and Road Initiative” has significantly increased the capacity utilization rate of investment enterprises in countries along the route, and this enhancement is mainly achieved through mechanisms such as expanding the market size of enterprises and alleviating corporate financing constraints. Further expansion analysis shows that the role of “the Belt and Road Initiative” in improving Chinese OFDI enterprise capacity utilization rate is mainly reflected in non-emerging advantage industry related companies, state-owned enterprises, companies investing in non-Chinese neighboring countries along “the Belt and Road” and companies investing in high-income host countries. The above conclusions provide theoretical enlightenment for the government to resolve the “intractable disease” of overcapacity under “the Belt and Road Initiative” from the perspective of micro-enterprises.

参考文献/References:

[1]朱希伟,沈璐敏,吴意云,等.产能过剩异质性的形成机理[J].中国工业经济,2017(8):44-62.
[2]曹亚军,胡婷.“一带一路”倡议对我国OFDI的影响效应:投资流出和风险偏好研究[J].中国软科学,2021(1):165-173.
[3]戴翔,杨双至.中国“一带一路”倡议的出口促进效应[J].经济学家,2020(6):68-76.
[4]ESTEVES P S, RUA A.Is there a role for domestic demand pressure on export performance?[J].Empirical economics, 2015, 49(4): 1173-1189.
[5]高晓光,赵俊男.我国制造业产能利用率测度与影响因素研究:基于十个重点行业[J].重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2018,35(2):12-19.
[6]魏利平,邢文祥.跨境电商出口对我国品牌国际化的影响研究[J].国际贸易,2019(12):19-26.
[7]苏杭.“一带一路”战略下我国制造业海外转移问题研究[J].国际贸易,2015(3):18-21.
[8]罗长远,陈智韬.“走出去”对企业产能利用率的影响:来自“一带一路”倡议准自然实验的证据[J].学术月刊,2021,53(1):63-79.
[9]韩永楠,武宵旭,葛鹏飞,等.“一带一路”倡议能否提高中国工业产能利用率[J].中国科技论坛,2020(6):54-62.
[10]JENSEN M C. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers[J].The American economic review, 1986, 76(2): 323-329.
[11]乔晓楠,王奕.长波理论的数理解析及其对新发展格局的启示:纪念我国著名马克思主义经济学家高峰先生[J].政治经济学评论,2021,12(2):36-61.
[12]冯伟.市场需求、政府参与和产能利用率:对我国工业行业的实证分析[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2019,40(5):26-35.
[13]张同斌,刘俸奇.贸易开放度与经济增长动力:基于产能利用和资本深化途径的再检验[J].国际贸易问题,2018(1):20-31.
[14]FOELLMI R, ZWEIMULLER J.Income distribution and demand-induced innovations[J].The review of economic studies, 2006, 73(4): 941-960.
[15]韩国高.环境规制、技术创新与产能利用率:兼论“环保硬约束”如何有效治理产能过剩[J].当代经济科学,2018,40(1):84-93.
[16]孙焱林,覃飞.“一带一路”倡议降低了企业对外直接投资风险吗[J].国际贸易问题,2018(8):66-79.
[17]许培源,王倩.“一带一路”视角下的境外经贸合作区:理论创新与实证检验[J].经济学家,2019(7):60-70.
[18]陈昆亭,周炎.有限需求、市场约束与经济增长[J].管理世界,2020,36(4):39-53.
[19]刘延彪.融资约束与企业产能利用率[D].厦门:厦门大学,2019.
[20]张皓.出口贸易能否化解中国企业产能过剩:基于微观视角的考察[J].山西财经大学学报,2018,40(1):54-67.
[21]王自力,黎绍凯,陈林.上游产业管制与企业产能利用率:基于垂直供应链视角[J].广东社会科学,2020(5):32-40.
[22]徐思,何晓怡,钟凯.“一带一路”倡议与中国企业融资约束[J].中国工业经济,2019(7):155-173.
[23]LUCAS A M, MBITI I M.Access, sorting, and achievement: the short-run effects of free primary education in Kenya[J].American economic journal: applied economics, 2012, 4(4): 226-53.
[24]ATHEY S, IMBENS G W.Identification and inference in nonlinear difference-in-differences models[J]. Econometrica, 2006, 74(2): 431-497.
[25]BORAH B J, BURNS M E, SHAH N D.Assessing the impact of high deductible health plans on health-care utilization and cost: a changes-in-changes approach[J].Health economics, 2011, 20(9): 1025-1042.
[26]李雪松,赵宸宇,聂菁.对外投资与企业异质性产能利用率[J].世界经济,2017,40(5):73-97.
[27]曲玥.中国工业产能利用率:基于企业数据的测算[J].经济与管理评论,2015,31(1):49-56.
[28]刘军.产能过剩与企业出口自我选择:基于“产能—出口”假说的研究[J].产业经济研究,2016(5):13-25.
[29]刘明,张雅亭.中国制造业产能过剩的测度与分析[J].中国发展,2019,19(5):8-16.
[30]修宗峰,黄健柏.市场化改革、过度投资与企业产能过剩:基于我国制造业上市公司的经验证据[J].经济管理,2013,35(7):1-12.
[31]薛军,苏二豆.服务型对外直接投资与企业自主创新[J].世界经济研究,2020(4):60-76.
[32]COVAS F, DEN HAAN W J. The cyclical behavior of debt and equity finance[J].The American economic review, 2011, 101(2): 877-899.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:刘友金,经济学博士,湖南科技大学商学院二级教授、博士生导师,国家“万人计划”哲学社会科学领军人才; 李玮瑾,湖南科技大学商学院硕士研究生; 周健,湖南科技大学商学院博士研究生。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目“共生理论视角下中国与‘一带一路’国家间产业转移模式与路径研究”(17ZDA046)。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01