[1]于冲,赵小涵.电信网络诈骗帮助取款行为刑事责任评价[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2021,22(05):13-20.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2021.05.002]
　Yu chong,Zhao Xiaohan.Evaluation of Criminal Responsibility of Helping Withdraw Money for Telecom Network Fraud[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2021,22(05):13-20.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2021.05.002]
点击复制

电信网络诈骗帮助取款行为刑事责任评价()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第22卷
期数:
2021年05期
页码:
13-20
栏目:
政治·法学研究
出版日期:
2021-09-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Evaluation of Criminal Responsibility of Helping Withdraw Money for Telecom Network Fraud
作者:
于冲; 赵小涵
Author(s):
Yu chong; Zhao Xiaohan
关键词:
电信网络诈骗;  帮助取款;  刑事责任;  承继共犯
Keywords:
telecom network fraud;  help withdraw money;  criminal responsibility;  succession accomplice
分类号:
D924.35
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2021.05.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
电信网络诈骗帮助取款行为掩盖诈骗行为人身份,使得司法机关调查的难度大大增加,助长了诈骗行为人的犯罪气焰。现阶段电信网络诈骗刑事责任认定仍存在不同程度的同案不同判之现象,司法机关相继出台了一些司法解释,但仍有矛盾和模糊之处。基于理论与实践的双重考量,围绕电信网络诈骗帮助取款行为刑事责任评价要点,对认定既遂标准、事前通谋判定、主观“明知”认定进行探讨。结合承继共犯理论,根据是否存在事前通谋和加入犯罪时的犯罪形态将帮助取款行为划分为三种,结合实践中帮助取款行为刑事责任认定,将帮助取款行为的评价司法类型化,以期一定程度上减少同案不同判现象。
Abstract:
The behavior of helping withdraw money for telecom network fraud covers up the identity of the fraud perpetrator, which greatly increases the difficulty of judicial investigation and encourages the criminal arrogance of the fraud perpetrator. At present, there exists the phenomenon of different judgments of criminal responsibility of telecom network fraud of the same case in different degrees. Judicial authorities have issued some judicial interpretations, but there are still contradictions and ambiguities. Based on the consideration of both theory and practice, this paper focuses on the criminal responsibility evaluation points of the behavior of helping withdraw money for telecom network fraud, and discusses the criteria for the identification of accomplishment, the judgment of prior collusion, and the identification of subjective “knowing”. Combining the theory of succession accomplice, the behavior of helping withdraw money is divided into three layers according to whether there is collusion and the crime pattern when joining in the crime. In combination with the determination of criminal responsibility of the behavior of helping withdraw money in practice, the judicial classification of the evaluation of the behavior of helping withdraw money is proposed to reduce the phenomenon of different judgments of the same case to a certain extent.

参考文献/References:

[1]于志刚.“双层社会”中传统刑法的适用空间:以“两高”《网络诽谤解释》的发布为背景[J].法学,2013(10):102-110.
[2]王志刚,刘思卓.论网络犯罪证明中的数额认定方法[J].重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2020,32(2):35-43.
[3]李会彬.电信诈骗帮助取款行为的共犯认定[J].国家检察官学院学报,2017,25(1):105-113.
[4]张志勇,吴声.诈骗罪专题整理[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2007:59-60.
[5]车浩.占有概念的二重性:事实与规范[J].中外法学,2014,26(5):1180-1229.
[6]杜文俊,赵拥军.财产犯罪既遂标准中的控制说及其司法认定[J].上海政法学院学报(法治论丛),2015,30(2):28-34.
[7]张建,俞小海.电信诈骗犯罪中帮助取款人的刑事责任分析[J].法学,2016(6):145-151.
[8]大谷实.刑法讲义总论[M].黎宏,译. 2版.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008:405.
[9]陈家林.外国刑法通论[M]. 北京:中国人民公安大学出版社, 2009:602.
[10]罗克辛.德国刑法学总论:第2卷[M].王世洲,王锴,劳东燕,等译.王世洲,校订.北京:法律出版社,2013:153-154.
[11]任倩.电信网络新型诈骗犯罪疑难问题研究[J].青海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,41(3):76-81.
[12]切萨雷·贝卡里亚.论犯罪与刑罚:增编本[M].黄风,译.北京:北京大学出版社, 2014:73.
[13]陈家林,汪雪城.网络诈骗犯罪刑事责任的评价困境与刑法调适:以100个随机案例为切入[J].政治与法律,2017(3):60-75.
[14]于志刚.打击电信网络诈骗 提升群众“体感正义”[N]. 人民法院报,2016-12-22(2).
[15]桥爪隆,王昭武.论承继的共犯[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2018,36(2):191-200.
[16]张明楷.刑法学:上册[M]. 5版.北京:法律出版社,2016:431.
[17]张明楷.电信诈骗取款人的刑事责任[J].政治与法律,2019(3):35-47.
[18]张明楷. 刑法分则的解释原理:下册[M]. 2版.北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2011:623.
[19]魏静华,陆旭.电信网络诈骗共同犯罪疑难问题探析[J].西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,37(3):23-29.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:于冲,法学博士,中国政法大学刑事司法学院副教授,硕士研究生导师; 赵小涵,中国政法大学刑事司法学院硕士研究生。 基金项目:国家社会科学基金一般项目“网络共同犯罪基本原理及其对传统共犯理论的突破研究”(17CFX023)。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01