[1]张建,朱泽然.论实习律师实习考核的法律性质及评价方式[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2021,22(01):1-9.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2021.01.001]
　Zhang Jian,Zhu Zeran.The Legal Nature and Evaluation Method of the Practice Assessment of Apprentice Lawyers[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2021,22(01):1-9.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2021.01.001]
点击复制

论实习律师实习考核的法律性质及评价方式()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第22卷
期数:
2021年01期
页码:
1-9
栏目:
政治·法学研究
出版日期:
2021-02-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Legal Nature and Evaluation Method of the Practice Assessment of Apprentice Lawyers
作者:
张建; 朱泽然
Author(s):
Zhang Jian; Zhu Zeran
关键词:
实习律师;  律师协会;  自治;  培训考核
Keywords:
apprentice lawyer;  Bar Association;  autonomy;  training and assessment
分类号:
D90-052
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2021.01.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
实习律师作为准律师,是律师队伍建设的后备力量。从律师队伍健康发展角度看,需要加强律师的进口关,实习律师培训考核制度是重要的控制机制之一。2019年9月,实习律师张文鹏诉深圳市律师协会一案,再次引起社会对律师协会性质、实习培训考核性质及标准的关注。实习律师培训考核需要从制度设计、律师队伍发展、实习律师自我完善和国际通行做法四个方面厘清培训的必要性。律师协会作为律师行业的自律与自治组织,应该依法独立地开展实习律师考核工作,遵循实质评价与形式评价相结合的标准。
Abstract:
Apprentice lawyers, as would-be lawyers, are the reserve force for the construction of the lawyer team. It is necessary to strengthen the admittance of lawyers from the perspective of the healthy development of the lawyer team. The training and assessment system of apprentice lawyers is one of the important control mechanisms. The case of apprentice lawyer Zhang Wenpeng suing Shenzhen Lawyers Association in September, 2019 has aroused the public concern about the nature of the lawyers association, the assessment nature of the practice training and its standard.It is essential to clarify the necessity of apprentice lawyer training from the four aspects of system design, lawyer team development, apprentice lawyer self-improvement and international practice. The Bar Association, as the self-discipline and autonomous organization of the lawyer industry, should work independently in accordance with the law to carry out the apprentice lawyer assessment, following the standard of substantive and form evaluation.

参考文献/References:

[1]刘武俊.律师的职业准入与执业自律[J].北京观察,2004(8):45.
[2]袁翠微.浅谈律师协会如何搭建青年律师发展平台[J].广西政法管理干部学院学报,2017,32(5):87-89.
[3]李华成.苏格兰律师准入制度及其对我国的启示[J].长江大学学报(社会科学版),2011,34(5):28-30.
[4]熊选国,陈明国,杨向斌,等.英国德国法律服务制度考察报告[J].中国司法,2017(10):76-82.
[5]詹宏海.澳门律师入职制度研究[J].港澳研究,2016(4):30-38.
[6]江畅.高科技时代的人类自律及其构建[J].湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,47(2):1-10.
[7]RESCOE P.The lawyer from antiquity to modern times[M].Minnesota:West Publishing Company,1983:11.
[8]汉隆.律师、国家与市场:职业主义再探[M].程朝阳,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2009:155.
[9]李学尧.法律职业主义[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2007:273.
[10]克罗曼.迷失的律师:法律职业理想的衰落[M].田凤常,译.北京:法律出版社,2010:309.
[11]王亚新.纠纷·秩序·法治:探寻研究纠纷处理与规范形成的理论框架[C]//社会变革中的民事诉讼.北京:中国法制出版社,2001.
[12]蒋超.通往依法自治之路:我国律师协会定位的检视与重塑[J].法制与社会发展,2018,24(3):91-107.
[13]侯东德.证券服务机构自律治理机制研究[J].法商研究,2020,37(1):129-142.
[14]周光礼.论学位授予行为的法律性质[J].科技进步与对策,2004(3):57-59.
[15]刘恒,邱新.论我国学位管理的法治转型[J].南京社会科学,2014(2):100-107.
[16]王慧英.从行政管理走向学术评价:论我国学位授予审核机构改革的理念转变[J].研究生教育研究,2011(4):64-67.
[17]李煜兴.许可与授权:论学位授权审核法律性质的双重性[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2019(3):87-95.
[18]周佑勇.法治视野下学位授予权的性质界定及其制度完善:兼述《学位条例》修订[J].学位与研究生教育,2018(11):1-9.
[19]蒋华林,刘志强.论律师业从自治走向善治:兼谈律师如何评价[J].法治研究,2016(6):63-72.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:张建,法学博士,常州大学史良法学院副教授、硕士研究生导师,浙江大学光华法学院访问学者; 朱泽然,常州大学史良法学院硕士研究生。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金一般项目“司法公正的社会认同及其机制问题研究”(18BZZ016)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-02-20