[1]李启平,陈丽楠.环境规制趋紧、研发投入增加与地区经济均衡发展[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2020,21(03):37-46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.03.005]
　Li Qiping,Chen Linan.Tightening Environmental Regulations, Increasing R&D Investment and Balanced Development of Regional Economy[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2020,21(03):37-46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.03.005]
点击复制

环境规制趋紧、研发投入增加与地区经济均衡发展()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第21卷
期数:
2020年03期
页码:
37-46
栏目:
经济·管理学研究
出版日期:
2020-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Tightening Environmental Regulations, Increasing R&D Investment and Balanced Development of Regional Economy
作者:
李启平; 陈丽楠
Author(s):
Li Qiping; Chen Linan
关键词:
环境规制;  环保税;  研发投入;  经济均衡发展;  系统GMM
Keywords:
environmental regulations;  environmental protection tax;  R&; D investment;  balanced economic development;  system GMM
分类号:
F205
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2020.03.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
环境保护费改税的政策效应日益受到学界的重视。基于2008—2017年中国30个省份动态面板数据,利用系统广义矩估计方法,检验环境规制趋紧的政策效应。实证结果显示:第一,环境规制趋紧通过增加研发投入、改进生产技术等渠道,对经济发展产生正向推动作用; 第二,研发投入短期会增加企业成本,挤占生产要素投入,抑制经济发展,但长期能提高环保技术水平,减少税收成本,提高生产效率,促进经济发展; 第三,随着环境规制的加强,经济主体不断增加研发投入,对地区经济增长产生累加效应,促进地区经济均衡发展。鉴于短期内环境保护费改税增加了企业成本,政府可以在政策层面设计一套补偿机制,激励企业增加研发投入,使企业更快适应环境规制强度; 在操作面上,政府应该考虑东、中、西部地区差异,制定差异化的环境规制策略,避免走东部地区“先污染、后治理”的老路,实现经济均衡发展。
Abstract:
The policy effects of the environmental protection fee reform have been increasingly valued by the academic community. Based on China's 30 provincial dynamic panel data from 2008 to 2017, this paper uses the system generalized moment estimation method to test the policy effects of the tightening environmental regulations. Empirical results show that: first, the tightening environmental regulations have positively promoted the economic development by increasing R&D investment and improving production technology. Second, R&D investment increases enterprises' costs in the short term, squeezes investment in production factors and curbs the economic development. However, in the long run, it improves the environmental protection technology, reduces tax costs, increases production efficiency and promotes the economic development. Third, with the strengthening of the environmental regulations, economic entities continue to increase R&D investment, which has an additive effect on the regional economic growth, thereby promoting the balanced regional economic development. The policy implications of the study are: in view of the fact that the implementation of the environmental protection fee reform increases the costs of enterprises in the short term, the government can design a compensation mechanism at the policy level to encourage enterprises to invest in R&D, so that enterprises can adapt to the intensity of environmental regulations more quickly; at the operational level, the government should consider the regional differences among the eastern, central and western regions and formulate differentiated environmental regulation strategies, avoiding the old path of “pollution first, governance later” in the eastern region and achieving the balanced economic development.

参考文献/References:

[1] PORTER M E, VAN DER LINDE C. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship[J].Journal of economic perspectives,1995,9(4):97-118.
[2] LANJOUW J O, MODY A. Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology[J].Research policy,1996,25(4):549-571.
[3]余伟,陈强,陈华.环境规制、技术创新与经营绩效:基于37个工业行业的实证分析[J].科研管理,2017,38(2):18-25.
[4]谢乔昕.环境规制扰动、政企关系与企业研发投入[J].科学学研究,2016,34(5):713-719.
[5]沈能,刘凤朝.高强度的环境规制真能促进技术创新吗:基于“波特假说”的再检验[J].中国软科学,2012(4):49-59.
[6]GRILICHES Z. Productivity R&D and basic research at the firm level in the 1970's[J].American economic review,1986(76):142-154.
[7]温涛,张梓榆.信贷扩张、研发投入与中国经济增长的“量”与“质”[J].科研管理,2018,39(1):1-8.
[8]冯志军,陈伟,杨朝均.环境规制差异、创新驱动与中国经济绿色增长[J].技术经济,2017,36(8):61-69.
[9]盛明科,孟佳.技术进步对区域科技创新绩效的影响及政策优化研究:不同投入强度下的门槛效应[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2019,20(4):56-66.
[10]LANS BOVENBERG A, DE MOOIJ R A.Environmental tax reform and endogenous growth[J].Journal of public economics,1997,63(2):207-237.
[11]刘平,向昌勇.环境规制对经济增长的影响:来自中国地级市层面的证据[J].当代经济,2018(6):10-12.
[12]WANLLEY W.The contribution of environmental regulations to slowdown in productivity growth[J].Journal of environmental management,1994,8(4):381-390.
[13]杜运苏.环境规制影响我国制造业竞争力的实证研究[J].世界经济研究,2014(12):71-76.
[14]BLUNDELL R,BOND S.Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models[J].Journal of econometrics,1998, 87(1):115-143.
[15]傅京燕,李丽莎.环境规制、要素禀赋与产业国际竞争力的实证研究:基于中国制造业的面板数据[J].管理世界,2010(10):87-98.
[16]李小平,卢现祥,陶小琴.环境规制强度是否影响了中国工业行业的贸易比较优势[J].世界经济,2012, 35(4):62-78.
[17]张成,陆旸,郭路,等.环境规制强度和生产技术进步[J].经济研究,2011, 46(2): 113-124.
[18]毛德凤,李静,彭飞,等.研发投入与企业全要素生产率:基于PSM和GPS的检验[J].财经研究,2013,39(4):134-144.
[19]张辉,刘佳颖,何宗辉.政府补贴对企业研发投入的影响:基于中国工业企业数据库的门槛分析[J].经济学动态,2016(12):28-38.
[20]向国成,邝劲松,文泽宙.研发投入提升经济发展质量的分工门槛效应研究:来自中国的经验证据[J].世界经济文汇,2018(4):84-100.
[21]卫平,余奕杉.环境规制对制造业产业结构升级的影响:基于省级动态面板数据的系统GMM分析[J].经济问题探索,2017(9):144-152
[22]徐建中,王曼曼.绿色技术创新、环境规制与能源强度:基于中国制造业的实证分析[J].科学学研究,2018,36(4):745-753.
[23]童健,刘伟,薛景.环境规制、要素投入结构与工业行业转型升级[J].经济研究,2016, 51(7): 43-57.
[24]李虹,邹庆.环境规制、资源禀赋与城市产业转型研究:基于资源型城市与非资源型城市的对比分析[J].经济研究,2018, 53(11): 182-198.
[25]贺胜兵,段昌梅,周华蓉.基于动态因子分析的中部地区产业转移资源环境承载力研究[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2018,19(3):48-58.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:李启平,经济学博士,常州大学商学院教授、硕士研究生导师; 陈丽楠,常州大学硕士研究生。
基金项目:江苏省哲学社会科学基金一般项目“环保税对江苏制造业高质量发展的传导机制及政策评估研究”(18EYB001); 江苏省哲学社会科学基金重点项目“江苏中小微企业发展金融支持政策研究”(16EYA004); 常州大学引进人才科研启动项目“税制结构性改革促进国家治理效率的作用机理及对策研究”(ZMF17020109)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-06-30