[1]陈杰.我国当代群体性行动的演进逻辑———基于国家与社会关系视角的考察[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2016,17(01):32-38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2016.01.005]
 Chen Jie.The Developing Logics of Collective Actions in Current China:—From the Statesociety Perspective[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2016,17(01):32-38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2016.01.005]
点击复制

我国当代群体性行动的演进逻辑———基于国家与社会关系视角的考察()
分享到:

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第17卷
期数:
2016年01期
页码:
32-38
栏目:
政治学研究
出版日期:
2016-01-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Developing Logics of Collective Actions in Current China:—From the Statesociety Perspective
作者:
陈杰
Author(s):
Chen Jie
关键词:
群体性行动整全性国家碎片化国家碎片化社会整体演进逻辑个体演进逻辑
Keywords:
collective actiontotal statefragmented societywhole developing logicindividual developing logic
分类号:
D0-05
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2016.01.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
我国当代群体性行动的演进逻辑可以区分为两种类型: 群体性行动的整体演进逻辑与个体演进逻辑。前者是指所有群体性行动的整体发展趋势, 后者指单个群体性行动的演变轨迹。就群体性行动而言,我国国家与社会关系呈现出两种不同的面相: 整全性国家-碎片化社会与碎片化国家-碎片化社会。整全性国家对碎片化社会的包容性掌控决定了群体性行动的整体演进逻辑,而碎片化国家与碎片化社会之间的多维互动决定了群体性行动的个体演进逻辑。
Abstract:
The developing logics of collective actions in current China include two types:the whole developing logic and the individual developing logic.The former is the whole trend of all collective actions,and the latter is the evolving course of individual collective action. As far as collective action is concerned,the statesociety relation in current China assumes two kinds of appearances:total statefragmented society and fragmented statefragmented society.The total states soft manipulation of fragmented society determines the whole developing logic of collective action,and the interaction of fragmented state and fragmented society determines the individual developing logic of collective action.

参考文献/References:

[1]房宁.正确认识和处理新时期人民内部矛盾[J].政治学研究,2013(6):39.
[2]刘能.当代中国群体性集体行动的几点理论思考——建立在经验案例之上的观察[J].开放时代,2008(3):110123.
[3]邹谠.二十世纪中国政治——从宏观历史与微观行动的角度看[M].香港:牛津大学出版社,1994:3.
[4]黄宗智.改革中的国家体制:经济奇迹和社会危机的同一根源[J].开放时代,2009(4):7582.
[5]Kjeld Erik BrdsgaardPolitics and business group formtion in China:the Party in control[J]. The China Quarterly,2012,211(September):624648.
[6]Lieberthal Kenneth G,Michel Oksenberg. Policy making in China:leaders,structures and processes[M]. Princeton:Princeton University Press,1988.
[7]Landy Pierre. Decentralized authoritarianism in China:the Communist Partys control of local elites in the postMao era[M]New York:Cambridge University Press,2009.
[8]李侃如.治理中国:从革命到改革[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2010:333334.
[9]OBrien Kevin,Lianjiang Li. Rightful resistance in rural China[M]. New York:Cambridge University Press,2006:66.
[10]包瑞嘉.中国的“温和权威主义”改革之路[J].二十一世纪,2004(6):410.
[11]Aadrew J Nathan. Chinas changing of the guard:authoritarian resilience[J]. Journal of Democracy,2003,14(January):617.
[12]唐文方.政权合法性比较研究:以中国大陆和台湾为例[J].国外理论动态,2013(7):6681.
[13](德)托马斯·海贝勒.中国当前形势之我见[J].国外理论动态:2013(1):6167.
[14]Yongshun Cai. Power structure and regime resilience:contentious politics in China[J].British Journal of Political Science, 2008,38(July):411432.
[15]Yongshun Cai. Local governments and the suppression of popular resistance in China[J].The China Quarterly,2008,193(March):2442.
[16]冯仕政.西方社会运动理论研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013:65.
[17]赵鼎新.社会与政治运动讲义[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2012:21.
[18]McAdam Doug. Political process and the development of black insurgency,19301970[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1982:52.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:陈杰,南京大学政府管理学院博士研究生,安徽财经大学思政部讲师。基金项目:国家社会科学基金重点项目“公民参与涉政网络事件的有序性研究” (14AZZ015);安徽财经大学2015年度校级科研项目“我国当代群体性行动的演进逻辑———基于国家与社会关系视角的研究”(ACKY1573)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-03-30