[1]钱玉文.知识产权禁令制度功能新探[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2015,16(05):24-27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2015.05.005]
　QIAN Yu-wen.New Research on the Function of Injunctive Relief on Intellectual Property[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2015,16(05):24-27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2015.05.005]
点击复制

知识产权禁令制度功能新探()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第16卷
期数:
2015年05期
页码:
24-27
栏目:
政治学研究
出版日期:
2015-09-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
New Research on the Function of Injunctive Relief on Intellectual Property
文章编号:
2095-042X（2015）05-0024-04
作者:
钱玉文
常州大学 史良法学院，江苏 常州 213164
Author(s):
QIAN Yu-wen
Shi Liang School of Law，Changzhou University，Changzhou 213164,China
关键词:
禁令; 功能; 行为保全; 惩罚性赔偿责任
Keywords:
injunctions;  function;  act of preservation;  punitive damages
分类号:
D923.4
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2015.05.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
知识产权司法保护中的禁令制度可分为临时禁令和长期禁令两种，临时禁令能有效遏制对权利人正在逼近的实质性损害，长期禁令能促成潜在被许可人与权利人之间知识产权许可交易的达成，禁令还具有惩罚性赔偿责任功能。司法实践中准确适用两种禁令，不仅能弥补我国知识产权领域惩罚性赔偿责任的缺失，而且还有利于促进知识产权的市场化交易。
Abstract:
Injunctions of intellectual property can be divided into preliminary injunctions and permanent Injunctions, preliminary injunctions can curb “approaching substantial damage” of intellectual property, permanent injunctions can contribute to reach intellectual property licensing deals, injunctive function of intellectual property protection system is similar as punitive damages. It makes up for the lack of punitive damages responsibility of our intellectual property legal remedies, we should accurately grasp the two Injunctions applicable standards and scope of judicial practice in the field of intellectual property, it not only can compensate for the lack of punitive damages in intellectual property remedies, but also can effectively promote the intellectual property’s licensing deals.

参考文献/References:

［1］肖建国.论诉前停止侵权行为的法律性质：以诉前停止侵犯知识产权行为为中心的研究[J].法商研究,2002(4):9.
［2]张晓薇.知识产权诉讼诉前禁令探析[J].知识产权,2008(3):65.
［3]Sharon K Sandeen, EliZabeth A Rowe. Trade secret law in a nutshell[M]. St Paul,MN:West Academic Publishing, 2013:177.
［4]Paul J Heald. Permanent injunctions as punitive damages in patent infringement case[M]∥Shyamkrishna Balagnesh. Intellectual Property and the Common Law. New York:Cambridge University Press, 2013:514-515.
［5] 王小钢.环境法侵害排除和排除危害制度[J].当代法学,2005(3):129.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*收稿日期：2015-08-10
作者简介：钱玉文 (1971—)，男，江苏常州人，博士，教授，主要从事经济法、知识产权法研究。
基金项目：国家社会科学基金项目（13BFX095）；2014年江苏省高校“青蓝工程”资助。
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-09-25