[1]赵淼.从哲学到政治哲学 ——奥克肖特政治哲学的思想根基[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2015,16(05):1-7.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2015.05.001]
　ZHAO Miao.From Philosophy to Political Philosophy—A Study on the Foundation of Oakeshott’s Political Thought[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2015,16(05):1-7.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2015.05.001]
点击复制

从哲学到政治哲学 ——奥克肖特政治哲学的思想根基()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第16卷
期数:
2015年05期
页码:
1-7
栏目:
哲学研究
出版日期:
2015-09-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
From Philosophy to Political Philosophy—A Study on the Foundation of Oakeshott’s Political Thought
文章编号:
2095-042X（2015）05-0001-07
作者:
赵淼
中共贵州省委党校，贵州 贵阳 550028
Author(s):
ZHAO Miao
The CPC Party School of Guizhou Provincial Committee, Guiyang 550028, China
关键词:
《经验及其模式》; 经验; 实践; 哲学; 政治哲学
Keywords:
Experience and its modes;  experience;  practice;  philosophy;  political philosophy
分类号:
D093
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2015.05.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
奥克肖特以对现代理性主义政治的批判著称，其政治思想早在《经验及其模式》中便奠立了根基。在这部著作中，奥克肖特试图揭示哲学的本质及其任务，并从整体经验的角度对三种经验模式逐一解释，其思想要旨是：身处一个“意义的世界”，哲学家的任务是解释而非改变。政治哲学首先是哲学，对政治世界的哲学思考并非着力找出一种完美无缺的方法与路径，可以去重构现代道德体系，创造现代政治的“理想国”，而仅仅是去疏解迷惑和澄清混乱，让现代人对自身的处境有更为清醒的认知。
Abstract:
Michael Oakeshott is known for his critique to modern rational politics, and his political thought is primarily sprouted on the foundation on his first book Experience and its modes. In this book, Oakeshott intended to reveal the nature of philosophy and clearly define its mission, and from the perspective of an overall experience, he focused on explaining the three empirical modes one by one. The core of his political thought is that while living in a world of meaning, the task of a philosopher is to explain rather than change. Political philosophy is firstly philosophy in essence. The air of philosophical reflections on the political world is not to find perfect methods and routes that can reconstruct modern moral system and create a new “Utopia”, but merely to reduce and clarify the confusion in modern politics and help people to get more appropriate understanding of the situation of modernity.

参考文献/References:

［1］[英]莱斯诺夫.二十世纪的政治哲学家[M].冯克利,译.北京：商务印书馆,2001:157.
［2]Michael Oakeshott. What is history? And other essays[M]. Charlottesville, VA:Imprint Academic,2004.
［3]Michael Oakeshott. Experience and its modes[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1933.
［4][古希腊]柏拉图.理想国[M].郭斌和,张竹明,译.北京：商务印书馆,1986:243-247.
［5]Leo Strauss.What is political philosophy? And other studies[M]. Glencoe, Ill:Free Press,1959:221-232.
［6][美]斯特劳斯.自然权利与历史[M].彭刚,译.北京：三联书店:200:13.
［7]贺照田.西方现代性的曲折展开[M].长春：吉林人民出版社,2002:347.
［8][德]黑格尔.法哲学原理[M].范扬,张企泰,译.北京：商务印书馆,1961:11.
［9]Michael Oakeshott. On history and other essays[M].Totowa,N J:Barnes & Noble, 1983:90.
［10]Efraim Podoksik.In defence of modernity[M]. Charlottesville, VA:Imprint Academic, 2003:43.
［11]W J Coats.Oakeshott and his contemporaries[M]. Selinsgrove, PA:Susquehanna University Press,2000:47-51.
［12]Michael Oakeshott. On human conduct[M].Oxford:Clarendon Press,1975:25.
［13]M Cranston Michael oakeshott’s politics[J]. Encounter,1967,28:82.
［14]Michael Oakeshott. Religion, politics and the moral life[M]. New Haven:Yale University Press, 1993:137.
［15][英]洛克林.公法与政治理论[M].郑戈,译.北京：商务印书馆,2002:115.
［16][英]韦伯.民族国家与经济政策[M].甘阳,编选.甘阳，等，译.北京：三联书店,1997:90.
［17][德]马克思，恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集：第一卷[M].北京：人民出版社,1995:57.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*收稿日期：2015-07-05
作者简介：赵淼(1977—)，男，白族，贵州大方人，博士,教授，主要从事政治学理论研究。
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-09-25