[1]郭艳婷.从乌台诗案看北宋官员犯罪司法程序的特点[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2014,15(01):57-61.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2014.01.013]
　GUO Yan-ting.On the Characteristics of Judicial Procedures of Crimes Committed by Government Officials in Wutai Poem Case in the Northern Song Dynasty[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2014,15(01):57-61.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2014.01.013]
点击复制

从乌台诗案看北宋官员犯罪司法程序的特点()
分享到：

常州大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:2095-042X/CN:32-1821/C]

卷:
第15卷
期数:
2014年01期
页码:
57-61
栏目:
文史研究
出版日期:
2014-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Characteristics of Judicial Procedures of Crimes Committed by Government Officials in Wutai Poem Case in the Northern Song Dynasty
作者:
郭艳婷
中共平顶山市委党校，河南平顶山467000
Author(s):
GUO Yan-ting
Party school of CPC Pingdingshan Municipal Committee, Pingdingshan 467000，China
关键词:
乌台诗案; 北宋; 官员犯罪; 司法程序
Keywords:
Wutai poem case;  Northern Song dynasty; crimes committed by government officials; judicial procedure
分类号:
D929
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2014.01.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
乌台诗案是北宋中期著名的诏狱。这个由皇帝直接掌管的需皇帝下诏书始能系狱的审判高官犯罪的案子，其司法审判也是按从劾奏到圣裁等七个程序逐一进行，是诏狱审判制度的具体实施，最终的处罚结果也符合当时法律规定。官员犯罪的司法程序是围绕查明犯罪事实、促使犯罪官员认罪伏法设计，包括诏狱在内的绝大部分案件能够按照法律规定进行，即所谓“法在有司”。而统治者综合考虑各种因素亲自下诏书最终定罪，除了训诫教化作用之外，在很大程度上具有显示权威的政治意义，是所谓“恩归主上”。
Abstract:
Wutai poem case is famous for the imperial edict imprisonment in the middle Northern Song Dynasty.The case was directly presided over by the emperor and the imperial edict was required to imprison high-ranking government officials. Also the judicial trial was carried out through seven procedures one by one from impeachment to sentence by the emperor. It was the concrete implementation of the imperial edict trial system. Besides, the final sentences were in line with the prevailing legal provisions of punishment. Judicial procedure was to make the official criminals plead guilty by the identification of crimes. Including the imperial edict cases, most could be carried out according to the laws. After comprehensively considered various factors, the emperor delivered the conviction edict, mostly for the purpose of displaying the authoritative power, in addition to reprimand enlightenment, which was?the so-called “all should be owned to the emperor”.

参考文献/References:

[1]曾枣庄．论眉山诗案［Ｊ］ ．四川师范学院学报：哲学社会科 学版，１９８０ （３）：５９—６４．８８．
[2］杨胜宽．乌台诗案前后的苏轼［Ｊ］ ．宜宾师专学报，１９９３ （１）：１０２—１０６．
[3］殷啸虎．乌台诗案与宋代法制［Ｊ］ ．法治论丛，１９９３ （５）： ６３—６６．
[4］李焘．长编［Ｍ］．北京：中华书局，１９８６．
[5］孔凡礼．苏轼年谱［Ｍ］．北京：中华书局，１９９８．
[6］周必大．二老堂诗话·记东坡乌台诗案［Ｍ］．北京：中华书 局，２００４：６６７—６６８．
[7］朋九万．东坡乌台诗案［Ｍ］．台北：宏业书局，１９６８：６．
[8］宋史编纂者．宋史·张璪传［Ｍ］ ．北京：中华书局，１９６６： １０５７０．

相似文献/References:

[1]陈翔.北宋亡国的均势机理分析[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2014,15(06):81.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2014.06.018]
　CHEN Xiang.An Analysis of the Subjugation of the Northern Song Dynasty Based on the Theory of Balance of Power[J].Journal of Changzhou University(Social Science Edition),2014,15(01):81.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-042X.2014.06.018]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介：郭艳婷（1978—），女，河南扶沟人，硕士，讲师，主要从事刑法学研究。
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-01-25